Command A+ vs Moondream 3.1
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Command A+ is 29% cheaper than Moondream 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K vs 32K).
| Command A+ | Moondream 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.50 | $2.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.60 | $0.85 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.15 | — |
| Context window | 192K | 32K |
| Max output | 64K | 4K |
| Intelligence index | 6.2 | — |
| Coding index | 27.8 | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Moondream 3.1?
Command A+ is 29% cheaper than Moondream 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Command A+ vs Moondream 3.1: which has a bigger context window?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Moondream 3.1: 32,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Command A+ ≈ $1,350, Moondream 3.1 ≈ $1,850.
More comparisons
Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 TerraCommand A+ vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProCommand A+ vs Kimi K3.1 ProCommand A+ vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashCommand A+ vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Command A+ vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLCommand A+ vs Gemini 4 ArgonCommand A+ vs Claude Haiku 5.5Command A+ vs Nano Banana 2.1Command A+ vs Mistral Large 4Command A+ vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProCommand A+ vs GPT-6.1 SolCommand A+ vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeCommand A+ vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeCommand A+ vs GPT-6 Luna ProMoondream 3.1 vs GPT-6.1 TerraMoondream 3.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProMoondream 3.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProMoondream 3.1 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashMoondream 3.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Moondream 3.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLMoondream 3.1 vs Gemini 4 ArgonMoondream 3.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5