Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek
$0.022 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.022
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.12
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.004
Context window1M1M
Max output128K944K
Intelligence index——
Coding index71.5—
Providers1036
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-06-302026-09-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 5 ≈ $9,000, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $244.00.

More comparisons