Claude Sonnet 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Xiaomi
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (26.7 vs 18.9). MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 200K).
Claude Sonnet 4MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.14
Output price / 1M$15.00$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.0028
Context window200K1.1M
Max output64K131K
Intelligence index18.926.7
Coding index37.6—
Providers—8
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-05-222026-09-21
Retirement2026-10-15—

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 34.3× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4: 200,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4 ≈ $13,500, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons