Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 40.8× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (28.6 vs 18.9). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
Claude Sonnet 4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.098
Output price / 1M$15.00$0.29
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.0029
Context window200K1M
Max output64K393K
Intelligence index18.928.6
Coding index37.6—
Providers—47
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-05-222026-10-17
Retirement2026-10-15—

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 40.8× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4: 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4 ≈ $13,500, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00.

More comparisons