Claude Sonnet 4 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic
$3.00 / $15.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 121.2× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (27.8 vs 18.9). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
Claude Sonnet 4GLM 5.3 Flash
Input price / 1M$3.00$0.0399
Output price / 1M$15.00$0.0784
Blended price (3:1)$6.00$0.0495
Cached input / 1M$0.30$0.03
Context window200K1M
Max output64K131K
Intelligence index18.927.8
Coding index37.671.5
Providers—42
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-05-222026-08-26
Retirement2026-10-15—

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 121.2× cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Sonnet 4 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4: 200,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Sonnet 4 ≈ $13,500, GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00.

More comparisons