Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Weaver (alpha)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Weaver (alpha)

Mancer
$0.30 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
M
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 is 43% cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Weaver (alpha)
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.30
Context window1M8K
Max output128K6K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-072023-08-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Weaver (alpha)?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is 43% cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Weaver (alpha): which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Weaver (alpha): 8,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Weaver (alpha) ≈ $850.00.

More comparisons