Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
NVIDIA
Verdict: Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers101
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-072026-06-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety are priced identically.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons