Claude Fable 5.2 vs UnslopNemo 12B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
T

UnslopNemo 12B

Thedrummer
$0.40 / $0.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
T
Verdict: UnslopNemo 12B is 40.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. UnslopNemo 12B has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2UnslopNemo 12B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.40
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.40
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.40
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M1M
Max output128K819K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-072024-11-08
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or UnslopNemo 12B?

UnslopNemo 12B is 40.0× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs UnslopNemo 12B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. UnslopNemo 12B: 1,024,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, UnslopNemo 12B ≈ $1,000.

More comparisons