Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 69.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.23
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.016
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers51
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 69.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons