Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA
$0.06 / $0.24
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 152.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.06
Output price / 1M$40.00$0.24
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.10
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index—14.4
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072025-12-14
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 152.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ≈ $240.00.

More comparisons