Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT Audio
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GPT Audio is 3.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
| Claude Fable 5.2 | GPT Audio | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $8.00 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $40.00 | $10.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $16.00 | $4.38 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 64.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 5 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-07 | 2026-01-19 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT Audio?
GPT Audio is 3.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT Audio: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. GPT Audio: 128,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, GPT Audio ≈ $10,000.
More comparisons
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Hy4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nano Banana 2.1Claude Fable 5.2 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT Audio vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT Audio vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT Audio vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT Audio vs Hy4GPT Audio vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT Audio vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT Audio vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT Audio vs Kimi K3.1 Pro