Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
OpenAI

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI
$0.20 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
OpenAI
Verdict: GPT-5.6 Luna is 35.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 23.8). GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2GPT-5.6 Luna
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.20
Output price / 1M$40.00$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.45
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.02
Context window1M1.1M
Max output128K128K
Intelligence index64.623.8
Coding index—71.4
Providers57
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-07-09
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is 35.6× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, GPT-5.6 Luna ≈ $1,000.

More comparisons