Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
OpenAI

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

OpenAI
$3.00 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
OpenAI
Verdict: GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k is 4.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 16K).
Claude Fable 5.2GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Input price / 1M$8.00$3.00
Output price / 1M$40.00$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$3.25
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M16K
Max output128K4K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072023-08-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k?

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k is 4.9× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k: 16,385 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k ≈ $8,000.

More comparisons