Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5 Turbo

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5 Turbo

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$1.20 / $4.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Verdict: GLM 5 Turbo is 8.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 203K).
Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5 Turbo
Input price / 1M$8.00$1.20
Output price / 1M$40.00$4.00
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.90
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.24
Context window1M203K
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-03-15
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or GLM 5 Turbo?

GLM 5 Turbo is 8.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5 Turbo: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. GLM 5 Turbo: 202,752 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, GLM 5 Turbo ≈ $4,400.

More comparisons