Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Google

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

Google
$0.25 / $1.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Google
Verdict: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is 28.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (64.6 vs 6.2). Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.25
Output price / 1M$40.00$1.50
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$0.56
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.025
Context window1M1M
Max output128K66K
Intelligence index64.66.2
Coding index—34.7
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-03-03
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is 28.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview ≈ $1,250.

More comparisons