Claude Fable 5.2 vs ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Baidu

ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0

Baidu
$1.13 / $3.94
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Baidu
Verdict: ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 is 8.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0
Input price / 1M$8.00$1.13
Output price / 1M$40.00$3.94
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.83
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.11
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-11-10
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0?

ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 is 8.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0: 1,024,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, ERNIE-Light-DT-1.0 ≈ $4,230.

More comparisons