Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic
$10.00 / $50.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
DeepSeek
Verdict: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 76.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Input price / 1M$10.00$0.15
Output price / 1M$50.00$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$20.00$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.25$0.003
Context window1M1M
Max output128K393K
Intelligence index49.7—
Coding index80.7—
Providers442
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-012026-10-17
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 76.2× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.1 ≈ $45,000, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons