Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Q

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
A

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Q
A
Verdict: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 41% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Qwen3.8 Omni FlashTrinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.016$0.06
Context window1M262K
Max output131K80K
Intelligence index10.8
Coding index25.8
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-212026-04-01
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or Trinity Large Thinking?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 41% cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons