Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Q

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.23 / $2.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Q
Q
Verdict: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 12.7). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.23$2.00
Output price / 1M$2.30$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.75$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.25
Context window131K1M
Max output118K131K
Intelligence index12.745.4
Coding index22.176.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-07-252026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.0× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,610, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons