Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Seed 1.6 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
ByteDance Seed

Seed 1.6 Flash

ByteDance Seed
$0.075 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
ByteDance Seed
Verdict: Seed 1.6 Flash is 43% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLSeed 1.6 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.075
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.02—
Context window1M262K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152025-12-23
Retirement—2026-11-11

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Seed 1.6 Flash?

Seed 1.6 Flash is 43% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Seed 1.6 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Seed 1.6 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Seed 1.6 Flash ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons