Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.21 / $1.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.8× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.21
Output price / 1M$0.47$1.90
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.63
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.10
Context window1M262K
Max output944K33K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152025-09-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 2.8× cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ≈ $1,370.

More comparisons