Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Max Thinking

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.78 / $3.90
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 Max Thinking scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (21.3 vs 13.6). Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 Max Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.78
Output price / 1M$0.47$3.90
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$1.56
Cached input / 1M$0.02—
Context window1M262K
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index13.621.3
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152026-02-09
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 Max Thinking?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 6.8× cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 Max Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Max Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3 Max Thinking ≈ $3,510.

More comparisons