Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.12 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 30B A3B is 7% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 41K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 30B A3B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.12
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.21
Cached input / 1M$0.02—
Context window1M41K
Max output944K16K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152025-04-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B is 7% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 30B A3B: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B: 40,960 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3 30B A3B ≈ $490.00.

More comparisons