Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.14 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 25% cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.14
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.31
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.05
Context window1M262K
Max output944K118K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152025-07-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 25% cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ≈ $680.00.

More comparisons