Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
NVIDIA
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 46% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 33K).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.47$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.23$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.02—
Context window1M33K
Max output944K29K
Intelligence index13.6—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-152024-10-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 46% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 32,768 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons