Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.42 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
Q
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 9.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 12.9). Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen3.8 27B
Input price / 1M$0.08$0.42
Output price / 1M$0.20$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.11$1.06
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.085
Context window262K1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index12.933.7
Coding index26.868.1
Providers416
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-112026-08-14
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen3.8 27B?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is 9.7× cheaper than Qwen3.8 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.

More comparisons