Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

N

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

NVIDIA
$0.05 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.23 / $2.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
N
Q
Verdict: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 8.5× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.7 vs 8.9). Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.05$0.23
Output price / 1M$0.20$2.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.0875$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.03
Context window262K131K
Max output236K118K
Intelligence index8.912.7
Coding index14.422.1
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-142025-07-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 8.5× cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ≈ $200.00, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,610.

More comparisons