Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Mistral AI
$0.0938 / $0.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 34% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Mistral Small 3.2 24B has the larger context window (256K vs 131K).
Mistral Small 3.2 24BNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.0938$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.13$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window256K131K
Max output16K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2025-06-202026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 24B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 34% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B: 256,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Small 3.2 24B ≈ $312.60, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons