Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral AI
$0.40 / $2.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.03 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.7 Flash is 14.5× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Mistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.40$0.03
Output price / 1M$2.00$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.80$0.055
Cached input / 1M$0.04$0.006
Context window131K1M
Max output105K66K
Intelligence index9.2
Coding index20.5
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-08-132026-07-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is 14.5× cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Mistral Medium 3.1 ≈ $1,800, Qwen3.7 Flash ≈ $125.00.

More comparisons