GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral AI
$0.40 / $2.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
M
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 26% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXMistral Medium 3.1
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.40
Output price / 1M$1.25$2.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.80
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.04
Context window1M131K
Max output131K105K
Intelligence index9.2
Coding index20.5
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182025-08-13
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Mistral Medium 3.1?

GLM 5.3 FlashX is 26% cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Mistral Medium 3.1: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Mistral Medium 3.1 ≈ $1,800.

More comparisons