Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Trinity Large Thinking

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Ministral 3 3B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.10 / $0.10
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
A

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee Ai
$0.25 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
A
Verdict: Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 3.9× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (10.8 vs 4.8). Trinity Large Thinking has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Ministral 3 3B 2512Trinity Large Thinking
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.25
Output price / 1M$0.10$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.10$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.06
Context window131K262K
Max output105K80K
Intelligence index4.810.8
Coding index4.825.8
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-022026-04-01
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B 2512 or Trinity Large Thinking?

Ministral 3 3B 2512 is 3.9× cheaper than Trinity Large Thinking on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Trinity Large Thinking: which has a bigger context window?

Ministral 3 3B 2512: 131,072 tokens. Trinity Large Thinking: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ministral 3 3B 2512 ≈ $250.00, Trinity Large Thinking ≈ $900.00.

More comparisons