Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Pareto

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

Ministral 3 14B 2512

Mistral AI
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto

Unbiased
$2.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
U
Verdict: Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 18.8× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ministral 3 14B 2512Pareto
Input price / 1M$0.20$2.50
Output price / 1M$0.20$7.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$3.75
Cached input / 1M$0.02$0.25
Context window262K262K
Max output210K131K
Intelligence index6
Coding index14.4
Providers3
Best provider uptime (30m)99.7%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-12-022026-09-17
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 14B 2512 or Pareto?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 is 18.8× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ministral 3 14B 2512 vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?

Ministral 3 14B 2512: 262,144 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ministral 3 14B 2512 ≈ $500.00, Pareto ≈ $8,750.

More comparisons