MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Microsoft

WizardLM-2 8x22B

Microsoft
$0.62 / $0.62
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Microsoft
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.4× cheaper than WizardLM-2 8x22B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 66K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashWizardLM-2 8x22B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.62
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.62
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.62
Cached input / 1M$0.015—
Context window1M66K
Max output524K8K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-192024-04-16
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or WizardLM-2 8x22B?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.4× cheaper than WizardLM-2 8x22B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs WizardLM-2 8x22B: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B: 65,535 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, WizardLM-2 8x22B ≈ $1,550.

More comparisons