MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Ripple 65B Preview

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Ricursiveai

Ripple 65B Preview

Ricursiveai
$0.20 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Ricursiveai
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 13% cheaper than Ripple 65B Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
MiniMax M3.1 FlashRipple 65B Preview
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.30
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.05
Context window1M1M
Max output524K131K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-11-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Ripple 65B Preview?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 13% cheaper than Ripple 65B Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Ripple 65B Preview: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ripple 65B Preview: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Ripple 65B Preview ≈ $700.00.

More comparisons