MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.12 / $0.80
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 9% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.12
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.80
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.29
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.07
Context window1M262K
Max output524K236K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index—36.2
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192026-02-04
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Next?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 9% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Next on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen3 Coder Next ≈ $640.00.

More comparisons