MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen-Plus

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen-Plus

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.26 / $0.78
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 33% cheaper than Qwen-Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen-Plus
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.26
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.78
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.39
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.052
Context window1M1M
Max output524K33K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-02-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen-Plus?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 33% cheaper than Qwen-Plus on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen-Plus: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen-Plus: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Qwen-Plus ≈ $910.00.

More comparisons