MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Mistral AI

Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Mistral AI
$0.10 / $0.30
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
Mistral AI
Verdict: Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 43% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMistral Small 3.2 24B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.60$0.30
Blended price (3:1)$0.26$0.15
Cached input / 1M$0.015$0.01
Context window1M256K
Max output524K26K
Intelligence index29.1—
Coding index——
Providers11—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-192025-06-20
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B is 43% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B: 256,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00, Mistral Small 3.2 24B ≈ $350.00.

More comparisons