MiniMax M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

M

MiniMax M2.5

MiniMax
$0.27 / $1.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
M
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.4× cheaper than MiniMax M2.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M2.5 has the larger context window (205K vs 131K).
MiniMax M2.5Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.27$0.20
Output price / 1M$1.08$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.47$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.027
Context window205K131K
Max output128K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers81
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-02-122026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 2.4× cheaper than MiniMax M2.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M2.5: 204,800 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M2.5 ≈ $1,080, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons