MiniMax M2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

MiniMax

MiniMax M2

MiniMax
$0.26 / $1.02
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
NVIDIA

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

NVIDIA
$0.15 / $0.47
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
MiniMax
NVIDIA
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 48% cheaper than MiniMax M2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has the larger context window (1M vs 205K).
MiniMax M2Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Input price / 1M$0.26$0.15
Output price / 1M$1.02$0.47
Blended price (3:1)$0.45$0.23
Cached input / 1M—$0.02
Context window205K1M
Max output131K944K
Intelligence index—13.6
Coding index——
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2025-10-232026-10-15
Retirement2026-11-05—

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 48% cheaper than MiniMax M2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiniMax M2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which has a bigger context window?

MiniMax M2: 204,800 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiniMax M2 ≈ $1,020, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons