MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs UI-TARS 7B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

X

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
B

UI-TARS 7B

Bytedance
$0.10 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
X
B
Verdict: UI-TARS 7B is 29% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
MiMo-V2.6-FlashUI-TARS 7B
Input price / 1M$0.14$0.10
Output price / 1M$0.28$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.0028$0.10
Context window1M128K
Max output131K2K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers2—
Best provider uptime (30m)99.9%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-09-212025-07-22
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or UI-TARS 7B ?

UI-TARS 7B is 29% cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs UI-TARS 7B : which has a bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. UI-TARS 7B : 128,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00, UI-TARS 7B ≈ $300.00.

More comparisons

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 AstraMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)UI-TARS 7B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeUI-TARS 7B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeUI-TARS 7B vs Command A+UI-TARS 7B vs GPT-6 Luna ProUI-TARS 7B vs GPT-6 LunaUI-TARS 7B vs GPT-6 Sol ProUI-TARS 7B vs GPT-6 SolUI-TARS 7B vs Claude Opus 5.5