Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama Guard 4 12B

Meta Llama
$0.18 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.03 / $0.13
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.3× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
Llama Guard 4 12BQwen3.7 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.18$0.03
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.13
Blended price (3:1)$0.18$0.055
Cached input / 1M$0.006
Context window164K1M
Max output16K66K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-04-302026-07-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama Guard 4 12B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is 3.3× cheaper than Llama Guard 4 12B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00, Qwen3.7 Flash ≈ $125.00.

More comparisons