Llama 4 Scout vs Phi 4
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Phi 4 is 42% cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 16K).
| Llama 4 Scout | Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.07 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.15 | $0.0875 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 1.3M | 16K |
| Max output | 16K | 15K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 8.2 | — |
| Providers | 3 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 99.9% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2025-01-10 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Phi 4?
Phi 4 is 42% cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama 4 Scout vs Phi 4: which has a bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Phi 4 ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLlama 4 Scout vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Grok 4.7Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 AstraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Astra ProPhi 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimePhi 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimePhi 4 vs Command A+Phi 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 LunaPhi 4 vs GPT-6 Sol ProPhi 4 vs GPT-6 SolPhi 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5