Kimi K2.6 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Seed 2.1 Turbo is 42% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| Kimi K2.6 | Seed 2.1 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.95 | $0.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.00 | $2.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.71 | $1.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 236K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 27 | — |
| Coding index | 61.8 | — |
| Providers | 22 | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2026-08-12 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo is 42% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.6 vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Seed 2.1 Turbo: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, Seed 2.1 Turbo ≈ $2,250.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.6 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Command A+Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 Luna ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 LunaSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 Sol ProSeed 2.1 Turbo vs GPT-6 SolSeed 2.1 Turbo vs Claude Opus 5.5