Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 38% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 27). Qwen3.8 27B has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Kimi K2.6 | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.95 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.71 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.16 | $0.085 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 236K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 27 | 33.7 |
| Coding index | 61.8 | 68.1 |
| Providers | 22 | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-04-20 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B is 38% cheaper than Kimi K2.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
Kimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Kimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedKimi K2.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K2.6 vs Grok 4.7Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXKimi K2.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 AstraKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5