Inkling Small vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 3.5× cheaper than Inkling Small on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Inkling Small has the larger context window (1M vs 164K).
| Inkling Small | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.45 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.20 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.64 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 164K |
| Max output | 262K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 52.9 | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-07-30 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Inkling Small or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 3.5× cheaper than Inkling Small on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Inkling Small vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Inkling Small: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Inkling Small ≈ $1,500, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Inkling Small vs GLM 5.3 PrimeInkling Small vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeInkling Small vs Command A+Inkling Small vs GPT-6 Luna ProInkling Small vs GPT-6 LunaInkling Small vs GPT-6 Sol ProInkling Small vs GPT-6 SolInkling Small vs Claude Opus 5.5Inkling Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedInkling Small vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashInkling Small vs Grok 4.7Inkling Small vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashInkling Small vs GLM 5.3 FlashXInkling Small vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashInkling Small vs GPT-6 AstraInkling Small vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5