Hy3 vs Llama Guard 4 12B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama Guard 4 12B is 22% cheaper than Hy3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy3 has the larger context window (262K vs 164K).
| Hy3 | Llama Guard 4 12B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.13 | $0.18 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.53 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.23 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.033 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 164K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2025-04-30 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Llama Guard 4 12B?
Llama Guard 4 12B is 22% cheaper than Hy3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy3 vs Llama Guard 4 12B: which has a bigger context window?
Hy3: 262,144 tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B: 163,840 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy3 ≈ $528.00, Llama Guard 4 12B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeHy3 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeHy3 vs Command A+Hy3 vs GPT-6 Luna ProHy3 vs GPT-6 LunaHy3 vs GPT-6 Sol ProHy3 vs GPT-6 SolHy3 vs Claude Opus 5.5Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedHy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashHy3 vs Grok 4.7Hy3 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashHy3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXHy3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashHy3 vs GPT-6 AstraHy3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama Guard 4 12B vs Command A+Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 LunaLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-6 SolLlama Guard 4 12B vs Claude Opus 5.5