Grok 4.6 vs Kimi K2.6
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Kimi K2.6 is 43% cheaper than Grok 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.6 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (44.3 vs 27). Grok 4.6 has the larger context window (500K vs 262K).
| Grok 4.6 | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.95 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $4.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.00 | $1.71 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.16 |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 450K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 44.3 | 27 |
| Coding index | 76.8 | 61.8 |
| Providers | 5 | 22 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-12 | 2026-04-20 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.6 or Kimi K2.6?
Kimi K2.6 is 43% cheaper than Grok 4.6 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.6 vs Kimi K2.6: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens. Kimi K2.6: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.6 ≈ $7,000, Kimi K2.6 ≈ $3,900.
More comparisons
Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.6 vs Command A+Grok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.6 vs Grok 4.7Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.6 vs GPT-6 Astra ProKimi K2.6 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeKimi K2.6 vs Command A+Kimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Luna ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 LunaKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 Sol ProKimi K2.6 vs GPT-6 SolKimi K2.6 vs Claude Opus 5.5