Granite 4.0 Micro vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

IBM Granite

Granite 4.0 Micro

IBM Granite
$0.017 / $0.11
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash

inclusionAI
$0.021 / $0.063
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
IBM Granite
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 23% cheaper than Granite 4.0 Micro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Granite 4.0 MicroLing 3.0 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.017$0.021
Output price / 1M$0.11$0.063
Blended price (3:1)$0.0408$0.0315
Cached input / 1M—$0.0042
Context window131K262K
Max output118K33K
Intelligence index5.1—
Coding index—50.6
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2025-10-202026-07-23
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 23% cheaper than Granite 4.0 Micro on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Granite 4.0 Micro: 131,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Granite 4.0 Micro ≈ $90.00, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.

More comparisons