gpt-oss-20b vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 12% cheaper than gpt-oss-20b on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
| gpt-oss-20b | Ling 3.0 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.018 | $0.021 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.09 | $0.063 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.036 | $0.0315 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0042 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 33K |
| Intelligence index | 9 | — |
| Coding index | 20.7 | 50.6 |
| Providers | — | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | — |
| Vision input | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | 2026-07-23 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or Ling 3.0 Flash?
Ling 3.0 Flash is 12% cheaper than gpt-oss-20b on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
gpt-oss-20b vs Ling 3.0 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
gpt-oss-20b: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: gpt-oss-20b ≈ $81.00, Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50.
More comparisons
gpt-oss-20b vs GLM 5.3 Primegpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8 Max Primegpt-oss-20b vs Command A+gpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Luna Progpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Sol Progpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Solgpt-oss-20b vs Claude Opus 5.5gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedgpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flashgpt-oss-20b vs Grok 4.7gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flashgpt-oss-20b vs GLM 5.3 FlashXgpt-oss-20b vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flashgpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Astragpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Astra ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5