gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: gpt-oss-20b is 4.9× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| gpt-oss-20b | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.018 | $0.14 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.09 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.036 | $0.18 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.0028 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 9 | — |
| Coding index | 20.7 | — |
| Providers | — | 2 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.2% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
gpt-oss-20b is 4.9× cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?
gpt-oss-20b: 131,072 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: gpt-oss-20b ≈ $81.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.
More comparisons
gpt-oss-20b vs GLM 5.3 Primegpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8 Max Primegpt-oss-20b vs Command A+gpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Luna Progpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Sol Progpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Solgpt-oss-20b vs Claude Opus 5.5gpt-oss-20b vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedgpt-oss-20b vs Grok 4.7gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flashgpt-oss-20b vs GLM 5.3 FlashXgpt-oss-20b vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flashgpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Astragpt-oss-20b vs GPT-6 Astra Progpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Command A+MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 LunaMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 SolMiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5